Who is running the world?
Ada Homolova & Johan Schuijt
OpenSanctions
Johan
Project lead EveryPolitician and PoliLoom.
Villa Pamplemousse, Saint-Martin
Not the actual villa — for the real pictures see
GQ France . Photo: Jjpcondor,
Wikimedia Commons , CC BY-SA 3.0
Sentenced in 2019, 2023 and 2026 (appealing)
EU's Anti-Money-Laundering Directive
Photo: Santeri Viinamäki,
Wikimedia Commons , CC BY-SA 4.0
Panama Papers
Photo: Fundación Gabo,
Flickr , CC BY-SA 2.0
“It was an investigation about elections and candidates on
the municipal levels. In most German states there is
no central data source … you must
contact each municipality, of which there are
hundreds .”
“In the end wrote hundreds of mails and
sometimes had to fight, because some
didn’t want to give away the data …”
“A lot of the data on the municipality level is still
not accessible or even digital .”
Not just fraud
Public procurement.
Conflicts of interest.
The revolving door.
Asset declarations.
…
Who runs the world matters
Finance: anti money laundering.
Journalists: who to hold accountable.
Researchers: how power works.
Citizens: a basic right to know.
Today
Who runs the world matters .
Challenges.
Our bet: Wikidata.
Our tool: PoliLoom.
Verify real data.
Discussion.
Get your phones out
Just scan and vote.
Trick question: nobody knows.
No complete, up-to-date list of the world's politicians.
Where do you draw the line?
There is no agreed answer.
(We don't have one either.)
Constant flux
80 national elections in 2026 alone.
Regional and local elections (nobody bothers to count).
Between elections: appointments, reshuffles, resignations, deaths.
Source:
IFES ElectionGuide
Challenges summary
Nobody agrees on who counts as a politician.
Scattered records.
Constant flux.
Nobody can keep this up alone
mySociety built EveryPolitician — paused 2019, unsustainable on
grant funding.
OpenSanctions
Commercially sustainable open database.
Research resource for civil society, and an anti-corruption tool for industry.
The goal
Make Wikidata the definitive source on who holds power.
Capture the web (evidence archived).
Machines extract candidate facts.
Humans verify .
Confirmed data flows to Wikidata.
That's PoliLoom
Shows claims + the source passages.
You confirm or reject.
Confirmed edits go to Wikidata under your account.
Starting point: Wikidata
Wikidata
Positions
~170,000 imported
Locations & countries
258 countries & territories
Politicians
~710,000 existing
Search index
EN
Prime minister
FR
Premier ministre
RU
Премьер-министр
JA
首相
Every position, location and country — searchable in many
languages.
Capture the web
Politician
Q140089150
Wikipedia articles
linked language editions
Submitted sources
links you add
Archived snapshot
full snapshot, timestamped
Every source is fetched and archived before anything is extracted.
Machines extract
archived page
reads
language model
extracts
Member of the New Hampshire
House of Representatives
“She was a member of the New Hampshire
House of Representatives … from 2012 to 2016.”
verbatim quote
American politician
“Audrey M. Stevens is an American
politician.”
verbatim quote
No quote, no fact — every candidate fact cites the source
verbatim.
Mapping text to Wikidata
extracted text
“member of the
House of Representatives”
hybrid search
keywords
meaning
candidate entities
Member of the NH House
Q21971205
NH House of Representatives
Q…
Strafford County
Q…
No match, no claim
The model picks the QID that matches the fact.
Humans decide
you
Member of the New Hampshire House of
Representatives
Q21971205 · 2012 – 2016
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audrey_Stevens
1. “American politician Audrey Stevens Member of New
Hampshire House of Representatives for Strafford 7”
2. “She was a member of the New Hampshire House of
Representatives and represented Strafford 7th district.”
Accept
Reject
confirmed
Wikidata
under your account
rejected
claim discarded
You check the claim against the source — then decide.
Let's do this together
On your laptop, go to
loom.everypolitician.org .
Log in with your Wiki account.
Choose languages you speak (and optionally a country).
Verify.
Thank you
You just improved the public record. 👏
We can build tools. We can't build a community alone.
Share the tool
Tell your network about
EveryPolitician .
Academic? Verifying claims makes a great classroom exercise.
Bring it to your wiki meetup, edit-a-thon, or hackathon.
Know anybody who needs this? Please introduce us!
Get in touch! Tell us what worked and what didn't.
We also need community for feedback .
Verifying claims felt… satisfying, or like a chore?
Would gamification motivate you — or invite careless approvals?
What would make you come back next month?